Construction objections — Rebuild
Administrative / planning law, Switzerland
What we are examining
Owners who want to raise an objection against a construction permit in their neighbourhood face an unappealing choice today: study the procedural law themselves or take the lawyer route. For many small proceedings, both are out of proportion.
We are examining whether a tool can take over the formal steps — deadlines, procedural logic, document structure — without stepping into the substantive legal advice itself. The earlier mprofi version is being rebuilt on Swiss infrastructure, without external cloud services.
Hypothesis
Three assumptions we are testing in the coming weeks:
— Owners want formal structuring support, not legal advice — that is a delimitable market — Law firms are more likely multipliers than competitors, because they reluctantly take on standard proceedings anyway — A flat fee per proceeding works better than hourly billing
What we do not yet know
— How the tool can clearly delimit itself from legal advice (UWG / BGFA compliance) — Which cantonal procedural differences must be reflected — Who supplies the first three pilot owners
Status
Validation under way. Andre’s own experience in the Räbmatt 14a proceeding feeds directly into the requirements specification. Go/no-go decision in Q2 2026.